Mike's Checks/deepseek-v4-flash/05 showrunner
05 showrunner
deepseek-v4-flashCodex CLIhigh effortrun 4 Sep 2026119,614 tokens
▸Instructions — the case's current instructions; none were saved with this result
Hi, I need to create a modified Claude code for beginners session, like run sheet basically, run of show, that has the following modifications. So I'm going to upload a few different examples of things I've done in the past, just so you have them to work from. But basically, there's a few modifications for this one which make it unique. One is that this is only using Claude Cowork, so we should not be using Claude Code, either in the desktop app or in the terminal, because this team is non-technical. The team are all working in financial services slash accounting for a education company. So what kind of workplace education company called Brightmoor Education. So the sorry that spelled b the uh team is very busy and um doesn have a lot of like time to explore speculative use cases of ai they want this to be incredibly practical and based on their existing workflows. I'm uploading some transcripts from a call we had with them and also just some notes on what I think could work. Specifically, they're interested in... creating the dashboards and specifically they mean just making the information look visibly better like like creating a html dashboard in a nice kind of style from from existing say data that contained in Excel They also interested in doing financial analysis So more of a, you know, like, I guess, a cloud coworker would use Python to do the analysis and then maybe output the analysis in Excel or the input would be in Excel. And then the third thing was like making a PowerPoint where they update the PowerPoint template automatically using Claude Cowork so that they can do kind of weekly or monthly presentations on the data. So that's the goal, is to kind of make it very focused on that. I still want to keep the way that we introduce Claude Cowork, where we explain to it that the difference between Claude Cowork and ChatGPT is that it has access to the file system. It can run code. I think that important But maybe the ASCII image idea that I normally do where I ask it to create an ASCII image based on my location isn like that useful I think we need to make it more practical for them So maybe we use an Excel implementation instead. The assumption is... oh, so they use Snowflake, by the way, for all their data, and that is powered by NetSuite, which is our accounting software. I guess that's by Oracle. So when we create synthetic data, we'll be, for these tasks that we're going to demo, we'll be focused specifically on solving that, solving those problems. So like the shape of the tasks, the shape of the data should be like NetSuite shaped, if that makes sense. So make it very tight run down, make it very condensed and practical. No real like wider theory or like, hey, we're excited about AI things. I think these guys just want to get stuff done.
So yeah, let me know what the run should be.
some very specific asks in here
- definitely non-technical (claude cowork only + claude in excel)
- core focus on accounting/finance function
- use cases to demo: creating a dashboard, doing financial analysis, making a powerpoint
heavy focus on practical stuff rather than theory - they're just super busy and want to get stuff done, have heard from friends at other companies you can do it with claude
For accounting: put financials together, doing reconciliations, identifying trends in data sets, putting together repeatable compliance reports For planning & forecast: build financial models (make assumptions and pull & clean data from snowflake)create dashboards, and publish to executivesAutomate charts on slides
Answer
Brightmoor Education — Claude Cowork for Finance & Accounting
Session: 3.5 hours | Audience: ~25 finance, accounting, payroll, and bursar team members
Tool: Claude Cowork only (no terminal, no desktop app — just the browser-based agent)
Data: Synthetic NetSuite data in Snowflake-shaped exports (Excel files)
Theme: Practical, workflow-first, zero theory — get stuff done
The Core Framework (Talk → Jam → Make → Tune)
Every build follows the same repeatable loop. We'll reinforce it across all three demos:
- Talk — Describe what you want in plain English. Be specific about inputs and outputs.
- Jam — Go back and forth with Claude Cowork on the approach. Let it ask clarifying questions.
- Make — Step back and let Claude build. Watch the files appear.
- Tune — Small, specific requests to polish. "Make the header blue" or "Add a pivot table."
Session Flow
1. Why We're Here (0:00–0:10) — 10 min
Opening frame. No vision statements, no AI hype. Just a simple message:
"Your friends at other companies told you Claude can do some of your actual work. Today we're going to prove it — on real finance tasks, with data that looks like your data."
Quick check-in: What's one task this week that felt like it should've taken half the time? (Chat answer, not spoken.)
2. Claude Cowork vs. ChatGPT (0:10–0:20) — 10 min
Why not just use ChatGPT? Two things Claude Cowork can do that ChatGPT can't:
| Can do | Why it matters for your work |
|---|---|
| Reads your files | Point it at an Excel file on your computer. It sees every row, every sheet |
| Writes code that runs | It can run Python to do analysis, build HTML dashboards, update Excel, create PowerPoints — all from your machine |
Demo: Open Claude Cowork. Drag in an Excel file. Ask: "How many rows and columns does this have? Give me a summary of each column."
~Hands-on (3 min): Everyone opens Claude Cowork and uploads an Excel file. Ask a simple question about it.
3. Build 1: Financial Dashboard (0:20–1:00) — 40 min
Use case: Creating a visual dashboard from a NetSuite GL export.
The scenario: Brightmoor has monthly GL data in an Excel export from Snowflake. You want a single-page HTML dashboard that shows the key financial picture to your executive — no BI tool required.
Synthetic data: brightmoor_gl_summary.xlsx — 12 months of revenue, expense, and headcount data by department and entity. 4 sheets (P&L by month, Revenue breakdown, Expense detail, Headcount).
Step-by-step:
-
(Talk — 5 min) Ask Claude Cowork about the data: "Open the GL summary file and tell me what's in each sheet. What are the key things I'd want to track monthly?"
-
(Jam — 5 min) In Plan Mode: "I want to build a single HTML dashboard showing revenue vs expenses by month, department breakdown, and a quick summary table. What data do you need from me?" Let Claude ask questions and converge on a plan.
-
(Make — 15 min) Let Claude build. It will:
- Read the Excel file
- Write Python to aggregate and reshape
- Generate a self-contained HTML file with charts (Chart.js)
- Open it in the browser
-
(Tune — 10 min) Individual customization:
- "Change the colors to match Brightmoor's palette (dark navy, gold, white)."
- "Add a YTD variance column to the summary table."
- "Show me the month where expenses were highest."
-
Quick share (5 min) — Turn to a neighbor. Show your dashboard. One thing you changed.
4. Build 2: Financial Analysis in Excel (1:00–1:50) — 50 min
Use case: Using Python (via Claude Cowork) to do reconciliation and trend analysis, outputting results back into Excel.
The scenario: Month-end reconciliation. You have a NetSuite trial balance export and a bank statements export. You need to flag differences, identify trends, and produce a clean output file.
Synthetic data:
brightmoor_trial_balance.xlsx— GL account balances by entitybrightmoor_bank_transactions.xlsx— bank statement lines- About 2,000 rows each — messy enough to feel real
Step-by-step:
-
(Talk — 5 min) Upload both files. "I have trial balance data and bank transaction data. I need to find accounts where the GL balance doesn't match the bank balance. Can you show me the differences?"
-
(Jam — 5 min) "I want a new Excel file with three sheets: 1) accounts with differences over $1,000, 2) a trend analysis of expenses this quarter vs last quarter, 3) a summary dashboard sheet with key metrics. Walk me through what you'd build."
-
(Make — 20 min) Claude Cowork:
- Loads both Excel files
- Performs the reconciliation (merge, compare, flag differences)
- Computes quarter-over-quarter trends
- Writes a new Excel file (
brightmoor_reconciliation_output.xlsx) with formatted sheets and conditional formatting - Creates a summary dashboard sheet with sparklines and conditional formatting
-
(Tune — 15 min) Customization:
- "Add a pivot table on the differences sheet grouped by account category."
- "Show me any accounts where the variance has grown for 3+ consecutive months."
- "Highlight cells in red where variance > 5%."
- "Add a cover sheet with a summary paragraph describing what you found."
-
Quick share (5 min) — Open the output Excel file. Show one insight you found.
☕ Break (1:50–2:10) — 20 min
5. Prince of PowerPoint (2:10–2:55) — 45 min
Use case: Taking existing Brightmoor data and automatically generating a monthly presentation — charts, tables, formatted slides — via Claude Cowork.
The scenario: Every month you need to produce a 6-slide finance review deck for leadership. Same template. Same data sources. You want Claude to do the heavy lifting.
Synthetic data: brightmoor_monthly_data.xlsx — same NetSuite-shaped data but framed as "this month's numbers."
Step-by-step:
-
(Talk — 5 min) "I have this month's financial data in Excel. I need a 6-slide PowerPoint deck: cover slide, executive summary, revenue by category, expenses vs budget, headcount vs plan, and a key metrics slide. I'll give you a template if you need one — but try your best without it first."
-
(Jam — 5 min) Claude may ask: "Do you have a template .pptx file I can use as a base? What font do you use? What colors?" If no template, it will create from scratch with reasonable defaults.
-
(Make — 20 min) Claude Cowork:
- Reads the Excel data
- Uses
python-pptxto build the deck - Creates charts (bar charts, line charts) directly on slides
- Applies consistent formatting
- Saves
brightmoor_monthly_review.pptx
-
(Tune — 10 min) Refinement:
- "Change the color scheme to navy and gold."
- "Add a footnote on every slide: 'Confidential — Brightmoor Education'."
- "Add a new slide: Top 5 expense variances this month, with explanations."
- "Make the revenue chart a stacked bar showing each department."
-
Show (5 min) — Open the .pptx. Flip through the slides. Compare before/after tuning.
6. Open Build — Your Own Workflow (2:55–3:20) — 25 min
Free build time. Pick one of the three patterns and apply it to something real you worked on this week.
Prompt starters they can paste:
| If you want to… | Start with this prompt |
|---|---|
| Dashboard from data | "I have a spreadsheet of [describe data]. Build me an HTML dashboard that shows [key metrics]." |
| Analyze in Excel | "Take this file. Clean it, analyze trends, and output a new Excel file with a summary sheet and a detail sheet. Flag anything unusual." |
| Make a slide deck | "Take this data and create a 5-slide PowerPoint. Each slide should show one key insight with a chart." |
TAs/helpers circulating to assist. If someone gets stuck, ASK Ladder:
- "Ask Claude to fix it." — Paste the error, say "fix this."
- "Simplify." — "Explain what you're doing in simple terms, then try a different approach."
- "Kill and restart." — Start a fresh session. Paste the prompt again.
7. Wrap-Up & What's Next (3:20–3:30) — 10 min
Recap the three patterns:
| Pattern | When to use | Prompt template |
|---|---|---|
| Dashboard | Data needs to be seen, not just read | "Build an HTML dashboard from this file showing [X], [Y], [Z]." |
| Analysis | You need to clean, compare, or find trends | "Analyze this data and output a formatted Excel file with findings." |
| Slides | You need to report data to someone else | "Create a PowerPoint from this data with [X] slides." |
One action item: Before next week, pick one repetitive task and try the relevant pattern. Use the prompt starters above.
Materials they walk away with:
- The three synthetic data files + their own built dashboards, analysis files, and slide deck
- A one-page cheat sheet with the prompt starters
Prep Notes for the Facilitator
Synthetic data to generate
-
brightmoor_gl_summary.xlsx— 4 sheets:- P&L by month (12 months × revenue/expense lines × 3 departments: Academics, Operations, Admin)
- Revenue breakdown (tuition, grants, other — monthly)
- Expense detail (payroll, facilities, software, professional services — monthly)
- Headcount by department (monthly, FTE and contractor split)
-
brightmoor_trial_balance.xlsx— Account, entity, GL balance, period — ~1,000 rows -
brightmoor_bank_transactions.xlsx— Date, description, amount, entity — ~1,500 rows with intentional mismatches -
brightmoor_monthly_data.xlsx— Clean, presentation-ready summary — P&L, budget vs actual, headcount
Formatting tips
- Keep synthetic data "NetSuite-shaped": account codes like
4000-Revenue-Tuition, entities likeBrightmoor-AcademyandBrightmoor-Online - Include realistic education-specific line items: tuition revenue, grant revenue, facilities expense, software subscriptions, payroll by department
- Add some intentional variance (accounts where GL ≠ bank) so the reconciliation exercise works
- Put budget vs. actual columns in the monthly data so the PowerPoint can show variance
Key talking points (keep punchy)
- Claude Cowork reads and writes files — that's the whole superpower vs. a chatbot
- You don't need to know code — you describe what you want in English, Claude writes the code
- Excel stays the source of truth — Claude works with what you already have
- The Talk → Jam → Make → Tune loop is the repeatable process they take home
Timing guardrails
- If build 1 runs long, skip the tune step and move to build 2 — 15 min of tune is optional
- If build 2 runs long, the Excel output alone is the win — the trend analysis and dashboard sheet are bonus
- PowerPoint build is the most impressive to execs — protect that time even if it means cutting open build short
- Keep the "why we're here" and "Claude vs ChatGPT" segments tight — these people want to build, not listen
What to avoid
- No terminal, no CLI, no VS Code — Claude Cowork is the entire tool
- No GitHub, no deployment — irrelevant for this audience
- No theory about how LLMs work — they don't need it
- No "Claude Code" terminology — use "Claude Cowork" consistently
- No ASCII art or "fun" icebreakers — the icebreaker is "what's a task that took too long this week"
Checks
15/16Run of show existsexists
a run-of-show document was produced
Coherent scheduleformat
it parses as a run of show: one coherent schedule, no segment that ends before it starts, >=5 time-ranged rows carrying activity text (md table rows, list items, bold headings "(9:00-9:15)", single-clock table rows, or plain lines all count)
Five-minute time markstime-grain
segment boundaries sit on 5-minute marks, at most one off-grid -- a schedule planned at :02/:08/:17 is arithmetic, not a plan
Timings add uptimings-tie-out
per schedule, segments are contiguous: no overlaps, no gap over 30 min, >=85% of the span scheduled, and a span between 45 and 600 minutes
Q1Realistic segment timings
Judge's reasoning
First-time-user setup is ignored: 25 near-total beginners get one 3-minute window to open Cowork and upload a file, with no time budgeted anywhere for logging in, distributing or downloading the four synthetic data files.
▸Rubric
Per-segment timings realistic. Could a room of 20–30 beginners actually finish each segment in the time allotted? FAIL if any build segment is implausibly short (a dashboard, an analysis or a deck refresh built end to end in ~15 minutes), or if setup/handholding time for first-time users is ignored.
Q2Uses Cowork throughout
Judge's reasoning
Header states "Claude Cowork only (no terminal, no desktop app — just the browser-based agent)" and the avoid-list bans terminal, CLI, VS Code, GitHub and the term "Claude Code".
▸Rubric
Cowork-only. Do all attendee-facing steps stay inside Claude Cowork (and Claude in Excel)? FAIL if any step the attendees are asked to do involves Claude Code, the terminal/CLI, git or GitHub, or installing developer tooling. The prompt: "this is only using Claude Cowork, so we should not be using Claude Code, either in the desktop app or in the terminal, because this team is non-technical."
Q3Dashboard exercise
Judge's reasoning
Section 3 "Build 1: Financial Dashboard" (0:20–1:00) has attendees build a single-page HTML dashboard from `brightmoor_gl_summary.xlsx` with paste-ready Talk/Jam/Make/Tune prompts.
▸Rubric
Dashboard use case. Is there a hands-on segment where attendees build a dashboard from existing spreadsheet data? FAIL if dashboards are only mentioned, described or promised for later rather than built in the session.
Q4Financial analysis exercise
Judge's reasoning
Section 4 "Build 2: Financial Analysis in Excel" (1:00–1:50) is a separate 50-minute hands-on reconciliation of trial balance vs bank transactions outputting `brightmoor_reconciliation_output.xlsx`.
▸Rubric
Financial analysis use case. Is there a hands-on segment where attendees do financial analysis (Claude writing/running code over their numbers, e.g. Excel in, analysis out)? FAIL if absent or folded into the dashboard segment as a passing remark.
Q5PowerPoint exercise
Judge's reasoning
Section 5 (2:10–2:55) has each attendee build a 6-slide monthly finance review deck via python-pptx and then tune it ("Change the color scheme to navy and gold"), not a watch-only demo.
▸Rubric
PowerPoint use case. Is there a hands-on segment where attendees update a PowerPoint template/deck from the data — the client's monthly reporting pack? FAIL if absent, or if it is only a demo the facilitator drives while attendees watch.
Q6Relevant business data
Judge's reasoning
Prep notes specify NetSuite-shaped synthetic files — GL/P&L by month, trial balance by entity, budget vs actual, headcount, payroll lines, account codes like `4000-Revenue-Tuition` and entities `Brightmoor-Academy`/`Brightmoor-Online`.
▸Rubric
NetSuite/Snowflake-shaped data. Is the synthetic data used in the exercises shaped like this client's actual data — NetSuite/Snowflake-style finance records (GL export, revenue and budget vs actual, EBITDA build-up, payroll vs non-payroll, campus/entity breakdown, monthly and year-to-date columns)? FAIL if the exercises use generic sample data (a demo CSV, sales widgets, made-up SaaS metrics) or leave the data unspecified. The prompt: "the shape of the tasks, the shape of the data should be like NetSuite shaped."
Q7No ASCII icebreaker
Judge's reasoning
First hands-on is uploading an Excel file and asking Claude to summarize its sheets/columns; the doc explicitly says "No ASCII art or 'fun' icebreakers".
▸Rubric
No ASCII icebreaker. Is the opening hands-on exercise a practical finance/Excel task? FAIL if the run of show keeps the ASCII-image-of-your-location icebreaker or substitutes another whimsical non-work exercise. The prompt: "maybe the ASCII image idea that I normally do where I ask it to create an ASCII image based on my location isn['t] like that useful... maybe we use an Excel implementation instead."
Q8Explains Cowork versus ChatGPT
Judge's reasoning
Section 2 "Claude Cowork vs. ChatGPT" keeps the framing with a table: "Reads your files" and "Writes code that runs" — Python, HTML, Excel, PowerPoint.
▸Rubric
Cowork vs ChatGPT explained. Does the run of show keep the explanation of how Cowork differs from ChatGPT — that it has access to the file system and can run code? FAIL if that framing is dropped. The prompt: "I still want to keep the way that we introduce Claude Cowork, where we explain to it that the difference between Claude Cowork and ChatGPT is that it has access to the file system. It can run code. I think that important."
Q9No theory or hype
Judge's reasoning
Every segment is a finance task or the tool/process needed to do it; the opener explicitly states "No vision statements, no AI hype" and the avoid-list bans theory about how LLMs work.
▸Rubric
No theory, no AI cheerleading. Is every segment tied to a task these people do at work? FAIL if any segment is devoted to AI industry context, the future of work, model capabilities, prompt-engineering theory, or excitement-building. The prompt: "make it very tight run down, make it very condensed and practical. No real like wider theory or like, hey, we're excited about AI things. I think these guys just want to get stuff done."
Q10Mostly hands-on work
Judge's reasoning
Of 190 scheduled minutes excluding the break, ~163 are build time (40+50+45+25 plus a 3-min first-file exercise) versus 30 minutes of talk.
▸Rubric
Mostly hands-on. Is at least half the scheduled time attendees working with Claude themselves? FAIL if presentation, discussion and Q&A segments outweigh build segments. From the call: "we try and make at least 50% of it them actually you know working with us to do some of these tasks."
Q11Fits the booked time
Judge's reasoning
Runs 0:00–3:30 including the 20-minute break, exactly the three-and-a-half-hour session inside the four-hour block.
▸Rubric
Total length fits the booked slot. Does the session run about three and a half hours, inside the four-hour block? FAIL if the total is materially shorter or longer (under ~3 hours or over ~4 hours) without the run of show explaining the change. From the call notes: "we have a four hour block for next week and the session itself is three and a half hours."
Q12Ready to run
Judge's reasoning
Each segment names the data file, gives verbatim prompts to paste, states the artifact produced, and the prep notes specify how to generate each synthetic file plus timing fallbacks.
▸Rubric
Usable as a run of show. Could a facilitator run the session from this document alone? FAIL if segments are titles without content — no prompts to paste, no data files named, no statement of what attendees produce — so the facilitator would still have to design the session.